Re: ID on passive packet measurement

[n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz]

Hi Randy:

Following up on Benoit's question about psamp, you said ..

> ipfix is looking at packet streams aggrated into flows, i.e. the
> connection semantics of the traffic
>
> psamp is looking at packet streams sampled by other algorithms

That's reasonable, but there's still potentially a lot of overlap
between the psamp and ipfx.  

Seems to me that although psamp may well provide different ways 
of specifying which packets are of interest, it will share with
ipfix the need for a clean, congestion-aware transport to get its
data back to whatever is going to collect and analyse that data.

Anyway, I'm trying to refine the ipfix agenda for IETF 52.  I think
it would be useful to have someone from psamp speak about psamp
and what it's trying to do.  Would that be a good idea?  If so,
can you suggest one or two people who'd be prepared to speak, please?

Cheers, Nevil

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Nevil Brownlee                   Director, Technology Development
   Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x8941      ITSS, The University of Auckland
   FAX: +64 9 373 7021      Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand




to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.