RE: draft PSAMP minutes

["Fulvio Risso" <fulvio.risso@polito.it>]

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
  post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
  message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
  address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
  automatically accepted. ]

Hi.
A couple of editorial comments.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-psamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-psamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Juergen Quittek
> Sent: lunedě 7 aprile 2003 21.21
> To: psamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: draft PSAMP minutes
>
> ...
>
> Unknown person: It looks like the group focuses on routers
> and switches.  Are workstations also in the scope?

Unknown person = Fulvio Risso


>
> Andy: Yes.
>
> Unknown person: Why would the readable MIB be a MUST

Unknown person = Fulvio Risso


> After a short discussion, read-only support of the
> PSAMP MIB was not considered as mandatory.  For small sampling
> devices, supporting the MIB could be a too strong requirement.
>
> Nick pointed out some terms that need alignment between
> PSAMP and IPFIX: field <-> attribute,
> PSAMP device interface <-> observation point
>
> Nick: We should use SNMP for configuration
>
> Andy: How does the WG feel about using the IPFIX protocol for exporting?
>
> Unknown person: we have a measurement tool running that uses TCP-based
> proprietary communication.

Unknown person = Dinesh Dutt
Measurement tool = application that does remote capture which is already
running and that uses TCP-based communication. The application is the
WinPcap 3.0 packet capture library (http://winpcap.polito.it), which has
been released in these days.

Cheers,

	fulvio




--
to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>