[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comments on draft-ietf-psamp-framework-03.txt - 2
Here is the comments on rest of the doc.
Thanks
Ganesh
7 Export Process
7.1 Collector Destination
When exporting to a remote collector, the collector is identified
by IP address and port number.
G: Transport protocol and transport port # (in case there are multiple
transport protocols)
7.2 Local Export
The report stream may be directly exported to on-board measurement
based applications, for example those that form composite
statistics from more than one packet. Local export may be presented
through an interface direct to the higher level applications, i.e.,
through an API, rather than employing the transport used for
off-board export.
G: You can mention that local export mechanism is outside the scope of
PSAMP.
Duffield (Ed.) draft-ietf-psamp-framework-03.txt [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Passive Packet Measurement June 2003
A possible example of local export could be that packets selected
by the PSAMP measurement process serve as the input for the IPFIX
protocol, which then forms flow records out of the stream of
selected packets. Note that IPFIX being still developed; this is
given only as a possible example.
7.3 Reliable vs. Unreliable Transport
The export of the report stream does not require reliable
export. On the contrary, retransmission of lost measurement packets
consumes additional network resources and requires maintenance of
state by the export process. As such, the export process would have
to be able to receive and process acknowledgments, and to store
unacknowledged data. Furthermore, the entity that hosts the export
process may not possess its own network address (for example an
embedded measurement subsystem in an interface) at which to receive
acknowledgments.
G: Is the above statement valid? Every export process needs a network
address
and the reverse communication in the form of ACKs can be expected on this
IP address if a congestion-aware (or congestion-responsive) traffic is
employed for export.
These requirements would be a significant
impediment to having ubiquitous support PSAMP.
Instead, it is proposed that the export process support unreliable
export. Sequence numbers on the measurement packets would indicate
when loss has occurred, and the analysis of the collected
measurement data can account for this loss. In some sense, packet
loss becomes another form of sampling (albeit a less desirable, and
less controlled, form of sampling).
7.4 Limiting Delay in Exporting Measurement Packets
The export process may queue the report stream in order to export
multiple reports in a single measurement packet. Any consequent
delay MUST still allow for timely availability of packet reports
G: Can MUST be changed to "SHOULD" there could be undesirable events in
an exporter which can cause more delay. Or the recomedation should be to
drop the reports if > delay.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>