[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Intellectual Property Statement for the sampling techniques draft
- To: psamp <psamp@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Intellectual Property Statement for the sampling techniques draft
- From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 03:29:46 +0200
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514
Hi,
During his session, Nick Duffield mentioned that he wrote an IPR section
in the sampling techniques draft, and that potentially we might need one
for NetFlow.
I started to investigate and this leads me to this question.
The IPR statement is pretty vague, specifically if I follow the link
10.
Intellectual Property Statement
AT&T Corporation may own intellectual property applicable to
this
contribution. The IETF has been notified of AT&T's licensing
intent for the specification contained in this document. See
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/ATT-GENERAL.txt for AT&T's IPR
statement.
Should we specify exactly which method(s) AT&T has got a patent for? And what is the patent number?
For example, the NetFlow IPR is pretty unambiguous.
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/cisco-claise-netflow.txt
Thanks for shedding some light.
Regards, Benoit.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>