|
Dear all, Here is a proposal for the IANA considerations section. 1. 9. IANA Considerations The PSAMP Protocol, as set out in this document, has two sets of assigned numbers. Considerations for assigning them are discussed in this section, using the example policies as set out in the "Guidelines for IANA Considerations" document IANA-RFC [RFC2434]. 9.1 IPFIX Related Considerations As the PSAMP protocol uses the IPFIX protocol, refer to the IANA considerations section in [IPFIX-PROTO] for the assignments of numbers used in the protocol and for the numbers used in the information model. 9.2 PSAMP Related Considerations Each new selection method MUST be assigned a unique value for the selectorAlgorithm Information Element. Its configuration parameter(s), along with the way to report it/them with an Options Template, MUST be clearly specified. Each new selection method MUST be assigned a unique value for the selectorAlgorithm Information Element. New assignments for the PSAMP selection method will be administered by IANA, on a First Come First Served basis [RFC 2434], subject to Expert Review [RFC 2434], i.e. review by one of a group of experts designated by an IETF Operations and Management Area Director. The group of experts must double check the Information Elements definitions with already defined Information Elements for completeness, accuracy and redundancy. Those experts will initially be drawn from the Working Group Chairs and document editors of the IPFIX and PSAMP Working Groups. Now, two questions: 1. I'm not too sure whether we should mandate a new IETF RFC for the new selection method description? 2. I'm not too sure whether we should mandate new IANA-registered information elements for the new selection method? In other words, can we have proprietary selection method in the selectorAlgorithm Information Element? Regards, Benoit. |