Re: Open Issue 1: optional compression

[Juergen Quittek <quittek@netlab.nec.de>]

Benoit,

I think the protocol document should state that with the choice of
IPFIX as protocol, the compression option mentioned in the framework
is not addressed.

Thanks,

   Juergen

--On 20.12.2005 14:31 Uhr +0100 Benoit Claise wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
> [PSAMP-FMWK] mentions the optional Export Packets compression (see section 8.5)
> Should we mention it in [PSAMP-PROTO]?
>
> This requirement comes from a time at which we didn't know that IPFIX would be selected.
> As [IPFIX-PROTO] doesn't mention compression, I'm in favor not to add anything about compression in [PSAMP-PROTO].
> I don't think that this is appropriate to differentiate the IPFIX and PSAMP protocols; the PSAMP protocol must use the IPFIX specifications as defined in [IPFIX-PROTO]
>
> Feedback?
>
> Regards, Benoit.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>