Benoit, I think, with the mentioned sentence we cover everything because we have IPFIX as basis... Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Dietz E-mail: Thomas.Dietz@netlab.nec.de Network Laboratories Phone: +49 6221 90511-28 NEC Europe Ltd. Fax: +49 6221 90511-55 Kurfuersten-Anlage 36 69115 Heidelberg, Germany http://www.netlab.nec.de > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-psamp@ops.ietf.org > [mailto:owner-psamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 2:50 PM > To: psamp > Subject: Open Issue 5: PSAMP transport protocol > > Dear all, > > The PSAMP open issue 5 is the following: > Transport protocol: SCTP and/or UDP and/or TCP. Nothing is > mentioned at > this stage. [PSAMP-FMWK] and PSAMP charter specifically mention UDP. > > Currently, we don't mention anything regarding the transport protocol > selection in [PSAMP-PROTO]. > However, I think that we don't need to specify anything as we > have this > sentence in the draft: > "The entire IPFIX protocol specifications [IPFIX-PROTO] MUST be > implemented for the PSAMP export." > This allows the same transport protocol choices as specified in > [IPFIX-PROTO]. > > Please let me know if you disagree. > > Regards, Benoit. > > -- > to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with > the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. > archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/> >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature