[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Open Issue 6: Associations ID -> Selection Path

Benoit and Tanja,

It is good to rename the AssociationID.

Would you mind using "selection sequence" or something
equivalent) instead of "selection path"'?

We have work on path-coupled packet selection (presented
last session) and trajectory sampling along a path.
Therefore, I am afraid that "selection path" might be
confusing.

Thanks,

   Juergen

--On 2/27/06 12:59 PM +0100 Tanja Zseby wrote:


Hi Benoit,

I will modify it in the PSAMP-TECH draft.

Regards,
Tanja
-----Original Message-----
From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 12:44 PM
To: Tanja Zseby
Cc: Benoit Claise; psamp
Subject: Re: Open Issue 6: Associations ID -> Selection Path

Tanja,

Will you modify the Associations ID into Selection Path in the next
[PSAMP-TECH] version?
Or should I add a short sentence in [PSAMP-PROTO]: "the Selection Path
is referred to as the Associations ID in [PSAMP-TECH]"
My personal choice, in order to avoid any confusion, would go for the
[PSAMP-TECH] modification.

Regards, Benoit.

Ok, I made the modifications for the new draft that I will be posting
soon.

Regards, Benoit.

Hi Benoit,

I also prefer Selection Path.

Kind regards,
Tanja

Benoit Claise wrote:


Dear all,

The PSAMP open issue 6 is the following:

   Even if the notion of Associations ID is mentioned in

[PSAMP-TECH],

   maybe a term such as SelectionPath or PathID would be more
appropriate.

The background of this issue is the following.
[PSAMP-TECH] specifies the Associations ID like this:

   ASSOCIATIONS        Values: <STREAM ID, IPFIX Metering process
ID, IPFIX Exporting    process ID, IDs of other associated
processes>    With STREAM ID: Observation point ID AND List of
SELECTOR_IDs
However, we concluded during the last IETF meeting that we don't
need the IPFIX Metering and Exporting Process ID.
So we're left with:

   Values: <Observation point ID, List of SELECTOR_IDs>

Since we don't associate anymore the observation point with
processes, it was proposed to change the name:
from "Associations ID" to "Selection Path" or "Path ID".

Personally, I prefer the Selection Path term, along with the
selectionPath I.E.
For the simple reason that we speak of selection methods all over in



the PSAMP drafts.

Feedback?

Regards, Benoit.








--
to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>



--
to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>




--
to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>