Benoit,
can we reuse the flowStartMicroSeconds Information Element?Or (if you are a purist), the "flow" prefix is confusing in a PSAMP implementation?Please provide your feedback.
From the purist perspective, I would prefer to create the new timestamp elements you list. They're more appropriate than flowStart... and may be of use in other ways in future.
If the latter, then we must define a new Information Element for the microsecond precision. And, while doing that, we should define the other precision at the same time: second, millisecond, and nanosecond.
Agreed. -- Paul Aitken Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland. -- to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/>