RE: Some thoughts

["Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>]

Bernard Aboba writes..

> So far, I'm not clear about the link between "attribute extension" and
the
> above goals.  Currently there are more than enough RADIUS attributes
left
> to handle the needs that have been described so far -- which would
suggest
> that attribute extension is not essential, and therefore is a
candidate
> for being removed from the charter.
> 
> Comments?

Acknowledging the existing RADIUS attributes in the IANA registry (both
approved by standards action and "grandfathered") it does seem that
attribute space exhaustion, within the scope of currently proposed work,
is not imminent.  I would support removing this work from the charter.

-- Dave



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>