Re: Extending RADIUS Attribute Space

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> There is always a possibility that the "need" may be for more than the "two
> critical target applications."  I can appreciate the desire to not open this
> WG up to a de-facto re-write of RADIUS.  But, we should be sure that we
> don't simply and arbitrarily exclude some generally needed work simply
> because it is not one of the "two critical target applications."
> 
> Or, to put it differently, maybe there are "three critical target
> applications."

and maybe there are 10,000 or 100,000,000,000,000.  it's gotta stop
somewhere.  and, to get chartered, it's gonna stop at the ones specified.
this is not a feature fishing expedition.  it is back-patching radius to
meet some very limited existing and deployed uses.  we have diameter with
which to go forward.

randy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>