[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Potential MIB work?

From draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-ops-02.txt:

  7.3.20  RADIUS MIB (RFC 2618)

  The problems have not been addressed and a new MIB should be defined.


  7.3.21  RADIUS Authentication Server MIB (RFC 2619)

  The problems have not been addressed and a new MIB should be defined.

There is more detail in the survey document itself.

So if a RADIUSEXT WG is formed, do we want to at least evaluate these?

Thanks,
Bert 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>