Re: Subtypes

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

Alan DeKok wrote:
> Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com> wrote:
>
> > I doubt that the SIP folks would support not using what they have in the
> > draft already.  But I will let them voice their objections (or not).
>
>
>   The Sterman draft is outdated, and subject to MITM attacks.  I doubt
> that it will be accepted as-is, as an IETF draft.  It will need to be
> updated, and implementations will follow suit.

As discussed in IETF-58, it will probably also have to support
full digest, and not just one algorithm. I don't know if this
implies the attributes have to be significantly changed, if the
design is good then probably not. But I am sure that there are
at least some changes to the Sterman draft before it is applicable
for all SIP users, and up to the level required from a PS RFC.

--Jari



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>