RE: Bof at next IETF?

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

I was not aware about a call for volunteers. I am volunteering to review the drafts. As they are individual submissions at this point in time, I would be grateful to be pointed to these drafts, as they are submitted and become available.

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Nelson, David
> Sent: 10 February, 2004 5:28 PM
> To: Parviz Yegani; Avi Lior; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Bof at next IETF?
> 
> 
> Parviz Yegani writes...
>  
> > Given the strong support from the last IETF I thought 
> RADIUSEXT was on
> > its way to become a new WG. What are we waiting for?
> 
> We are waiting for Internet Drafts, of suitable quality, that 
> fit within
> the proposed Charter, and volunteers to review those drafts.
> 
> I have noticed a flurry of drafts coming out just prior to the cutoff
> date for IEEE 59.  I would encourage all interested parties to review
> these drafts, for protocol quality, and also for compliance to the
> charter.  Please review the drafts and submit commentary on this list.
> 
> While there was substantial support for moving forward with RADIUS
> Extensions, there was equally substantial support for the 
> limited scope
> of changes to RADIUS as presented in the draft charter.  I 
> think we are
> making progress toward meeting the requirement for suitable 
> drafts, but
> we have a ways to go yet.
> 
> -- Dave
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>