[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Bof at next IETF?



Hello, John,

A number of drafts on Radius Extensions have been submitted for quite sometime
that need to be addressed in IETF soon. I'm not sure how this could be done if
the creation of the Radiusext WG is delayed further. I thought we agreed at IETF58
in Minneapolis that RADIUSEXT was the only home for these drafts, no?


Rgds,
Parviz


At 05:37 PM 2/10/2004 +0200, john.loughney@nokia.com wrote:
Hi Dan,

> I was not aware about a call for volunteers. I am
> volunteering to review the drafts. As they are individual
> submissions at this point in time, I would be grateful to be
> pointed to these drafts, as they are submitted and become available.

It would be good if authors of individual documents would send email
to this list, with pointers to their documents.  Also, it would
help to have the authors give a short explaination of what they
are trying to do, what things need discussion, etc.  I think the
chairs & area directors are waiting for some discussion and interest
level in this work.  The IETF generally doesn't have extra resources
to do any work or reviews if there aren't people voluneering to do
the work.

br,
John


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>