[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft

To: Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com
Subject: Re: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:23:16 +0200
Cc: BeckW@t-systems.com, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <357AEC66DB509A4EA46CB85D7968B6AF45CDF4@esebe006.ntc.nokia.com>
Organization: None
References: <357AEC66DB509A4EA46CB85D7968B6AF45CDF4@esebe006.ntc.nokia.com>
Reply-to: jari.arkko@piuha.net
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com wrote:

At least I don't have a problem to add this hybrid scenario to the Diameter SIP application. However, I wouldn't be able to compromise on removing any of the existing two scenarions, since I am aware of interests in deployments that will use any of the other two.

Will that help? If so, I will add some text to the Diameter SIP application, some motivation, and will send to this WG for review (just the relevant paragraph).

I think this would be useful. Thanks!

--Jari

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Prev by Date: Re: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft
Next by Date: AW: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft
Previous by thread: Re: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft
Next by thread: FW: HTTP digest and RADIUS; new version of the Sterman draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread