If not BOF then WG?

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Bernard,

Based on this email(below) then are we to conclude that there is still a
move to progress towards a RADIUS working group?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:aboba@internaut.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 2:42 PM
> To: Greg Weber
> Cc: Joel M. Halpern; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: RADIUS and complex attributes
> 
> 
> > I think it would be very helpful to produce some more modern 
> > recommendations on how to 
> format/tag/concatenate/encrypt/etc VSAs and 
> > when to pursue IETF space use vs. vendor (SDO) specific. 
> Perhaps this 
> > is worthy of charter work-item inclusion.
> 
> I think it is.  There has been some discussion about one of 
> the following types of documents:
> 
> a. RADIUS Implementation Issues and Fixes
> b. RADIUS attribute design guidelines
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>