RE: RE: RE: RE: draft-jones-radius-geopriv

["Mark Grayson (mgrayson)" <mgrayson@cisco.com>]

Farid

Is the chargeable identity draft available?

Cheers,
Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Adrangi, Farid
Sent: 17 February 2004 21:11
To: john.loughney@nokia.com; avi@bridgewatersystems.com;
mark.jones@bridgewatersystems.com; John Schnizlein (jschnizl)
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org; geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: draft-jones-radius-geopriv



> Is there any chance that the GSMA could bring their requirements
> to the IETF, so that we can ensure we don't have too many
> conflicting requirements & also have a chance to understand
> what are the real requirements?  I know the IETF has had 
> misunderstandings
> in the past with respect to 3GPP requirements.
> 

[FA] Yes.  Actually, I believe Jouni K. has already sent an LS from GSMA
to IETF (Bernard / David Nelson) on this.  

BR,
Farid

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>