[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RADEXT charter for comment...
- To: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>
- Subject: Re: RADEXT charter for comment...
- From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:12:41 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
- In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20040311113100.0222d290@localhost>
- References: <5.1.0.14.0.20040311113100.0222d290@localhost>
> Looking again at 2865, I am not sure what it means to say that
> Sub-attributes MUST be utilized only in a manner compatible with RFC
> 2865. Does this mean that that the base attribute must have a well defined
> type, and a total length less than 256? Or is there some other restriction
> in 2865 that I have missed?
The Type and Length fields need to be the same for all RADIUS attributes;
in particular the length restriction permits attributes up to 253 octets.
RFC 2865 explicitly permits grouping of attributes within the Vendor
Specific (26) attribute. Here's what Section 5.26 says:
Multiple subattributes MAY be encoded within a single Vendor-
Specific attribute, although they do not have to be.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>