Re: RADEXT charter for comment...

[Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>]

There is a proposal on the table to utilize a vendor-Id of zero
within VSAs, to extend the IETF RADIUS attribute space.  From my reading
of RFC 2865, it would be legal to support one level of sub-attributes
within such an "extension".  Whether this is a good idea or not is another
question.

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Joel M. Halpern wrote:

> Yes, the limits for size and type must be followed.
> If we want this restriction to say that sub-attributes shall use VSAs with
> a specified vendor-ID, then we need to say that. (I hope not.)
> If we want this restriction to say that for consistency with the VSA usage
> in 2865, all sub-attributes shall be one level deep, we should say that.
> I think that the sentence as written does not say what we mean.
>
> Yours,
> Joel M. Halpern

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>