[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rfc2486bis

> 1) examples in section 2.8: why is @howard.edu an invalid NAI? And
> why has eng%nancy@bigu.edu been removed from the list of valid NAIs
> compared to RFC2486? I believe it is still valid, or should it be
> put in the list of invalid NAIs?

Good catch.  RFC 2486bis should not be introducing non-backward compatible
changes.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>