[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rationalizing the RADIUS data model

> So, just for my clarification: what are the "potential
> backward compatibility issues" with a)? I think we don't
> have vendor=0 attributes yet, or do we? If we don't have
> them, it appears that the IETF can define the contents
> of the extended attribute as we please, no?

I think that was the question.  Are vendors using vendorID=0 already for
some purpose?


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>