RE: RADIUS V2

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

I agree totally!!! Then why are we considering new spaces and new rules and
new coding.

I am not opening these flood gates others are.

What happened to no new Attribute Types?

Avi 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:aboba@internaut.com] 
> Sent: June 12, 2004 10:27 AM
> To: Avi Lior
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: RADIUS V2
> 
> 
> If you're interested in designing a new AAA protocol, I 
> suggest you request a BOF at IETF 60 for that purpose.
> 
> Designing RADIUSv2 is not within the scope of the RADEXT WG Charter.
> 
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Avi Lior wrote:
> 
> >
> > Since it seems by the traffic on the list -- if we need a "fresh 
> > start"  the lets do it right folks.
> >
> > I propose that we create RADIUS V2 and that we include the new 
> > attribute proposed by Jari and do some other good things as well.  
> > After all, reading the list one would get the impression 
> that RADIUS 
> > will live a long time.
> >
> > Like a Phoenix RADIUS seems to have risen from the ashes.  
> I therefore 
> > propose that we call this version of RADIUS -- RADIUS Phoenix!!!
> >
> >
> >
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>