Re: Redirection Draft v1 is now available for review

[Ignacio Goyret <igoyret@lucent.com>]

At 21:35 7/20/2004 -0400, Avi Lior wrote:
>
>Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-lior-radius-redirection-01.txt

Avi,
The format to be used for NAS-Filter-Rule at the top of page 13
is not very clear to me from reading this doc. In particular,
it is not clear to me:
- whether the words 'from' and 'to' should or should not be used
- if the '/' character in the port spec is a character to be inserted
  or it means alternate choices (as in 'port' or 'port-port').
- is the '!' character allowed before port specs (to indicate
  "everything except these ports").
- are the "from" and "to" parts always required? Is either one optional?
  If so, is the other mandatory? (eg, if the "to" part is optional,
  is the "from" part mandatory?)
- which words are keywords that must be entered as is and which ones
  are tokens.
- for "ipoptions": is the comma-separated list an AND-condition (where
  all the listed options must be present) or an OR-condition (where any
  of the listed options must be present). Same for "tcpoptions" and
  "tcpflags".

Similar questions rise from reading the other rules (IP-Redirection-Rule
and HTTP-Redirection-Rule).

Please consider clarifying them. Examples are not necessarily needed
but can definitely help convey the idea.

Best regards,
-Ignacio

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>