RE: Moving forward on billable identities

["Adrangi, Farid" <farid.adrangi@intel.com>]

Yes, we will move this attribute (known as User Identity Alias in
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radius-attributes-exte
nsion-01.txt) to a separate ID.   
BR,
Farid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 2:34 PM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Moving forward on billable identities
> 
> 
> At IETF 60, there was a desire expressed to move forward on a document
> relating to the billable identities issue.
> 
> Here is what needs to be done:
> 
> a. Submit an Internet-Draft covering this subject exclusively.
> b. Request comments/reviews from the RADEXT WG mailing list.
> c. Assuming the reaction is favorable, request adoption as a WG
>    work item.
> 
> Note that there has already been considerable RADEXT WG 
> discussion on this
> topic, much of which has centered around the need for this 
> attribute and
> potential backward compatibility issues.
> 
> Therefore I'd suggest that the document make a convincing 
> case for why a
> new attribute is needed, and describe how backward 
> compatibility can be
> handled.
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>