Re: [Geopriv] review of the geopriv radius location attributes draft

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:

> > draft-ietf-simple-rpid-04.txt section 3.5.
>
>
> I believe there was agreement on that earlier.

Great!

> See also 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-pidf-lo-03.txt, 
> Section 2.2.3. While the two are the same, there is no reference to the 
> PIDF-LO registry. Since it seems silly to have two different ones, this 
> should be called out.

OK, I didn't realize that. Yes, it should be the same.

--Jari


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>