RE: alternatives for carrying eap lower layer information

["Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>]

Jari writes ...

> Yes, that was my question. I can certainly see this happening,
> but I'm uncertain if RFC 2868 is able to cope with it.

I don't think it would.  Since service provisioning in RADIUS is a
result of authentication (and authorization) I'm unsure how RADIUS would
address the set-up of a tunnel that is pre-requisite to the
authentication process.  That's what the incoming tunnel in this "two
tunnel" scenario would be, right?

-- Dave



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>