Re: [Geopriv] Radius-Geopriv: Civic vs. geospatial location information

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

I can easily imagine a situation where you have just one
part of the information in an easy manner. For instance,
a plain old GPS system will only give you geospatial,
whereas configuration might just give you just the civil
location.

--Jari

James M. Polk wrote:
> Hannes
>
> Don't forget that geospatial is mandatory to implement in PIDF-LO. Civic 
> is optional.
>
> I don't know what you want to do about consistency here.
>
> At 10:06 AM 12/13/2004 +0100, Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
>
> > hi all,
> >
> > currently the document says that civic location information MUST be
> > provided. Jari proposed to change the MUST into a SHOULD.
> >
> > we had a discussion on this issue during the geopriv meeting and i had 
> > the
> > impression that it is ok to change the MUST into a SHOULD.
> >
> > ciao
> > hannes
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geopriv mailing list
> > Geopriv@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
>
>
> cheers,
> James
>
>                                *******************
>                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>