[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Scope of applicability for CUI
The business cases for CUI have already been stated. And I think the next
email shows yet another driver.
I belive we already state why Class does not work and why CUI was choosen.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan DeKok [mailto:aland@ox.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:09 PM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Scope of applicability for CUI
>
>
> Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com> wrote:
> > Yes there is only one instance. But that is the least of the
> > differences. Unlike Class, CUI is supposed to be interpreted by the
> > client. In so far that the client knows the CUI is
> assertion by the
> > Home Network that this is a handle to a subscriber.
>
> If the main purpose of the CUI is to give an opaque handle
> to a subscriber so proxies can control multiple logins, then
> I'm not sure what it gains us. The home server can limit
> multiple logins, so the proxy server doesn't have to. As
> Emile said, if the proxy server doesn't trust the home server
> to manage multiple logins, it shouldn't trust the home server
> to create the same CUI for the same user.
>
> The main benefit I see is that the multiple login use of
> the CUI is managed by the proxy server, which means the home
> servers can be simpler to configure.
>
> If that's the main reason for CUI, then I would like to see
> a sentence or two in the document explaining the different
> approaches, the issues with CUI, and why this approach was chosen.
>
> I'm not opposing it, I just want the reasons for choosing
> it to be clear 3 years from now to people outside of radiusext.
>
> Alan DeKok.
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>