RE: Scope of applicability for CUI

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Because we want to get the document out. And we don't need to enumerate all
possible scenarios.  That is just silly and it is not done anywhere else.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, David [mailto:dnelson@enterasys.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:50 PM
> To: Avi Lior; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Scope of applicability for CUI
> 
> 
> Avi Lior writes...
> 
> > > There have been suggestions made that the content of CUI has some 
> > > local semantics at the NAS or a Proxy, beyond its utility for 
> > > inclusion in on-line or off-line accounting records.  To 
> the extent 
> > > that common use cases for local semantics (e.g. limitation of 
> > > simultaneous logins) are identified, they should be 
> documented, in 
> > > the interest of global, multi-vendor interoperability.
> > 
> > I think we cover that. But there are many other cases as 
> well. I don't 
> > think we should start enumerating these uses.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>