RE: Capabilites and Sub-capabilities -- was RE: Proposal: Capabilities Attribute

["Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>]

Avi Lior writes...

> We already have these examples out there that require to know 
> more then just capabilities but rather finer details.  I don't
> think we are adding unneccesary complexity.

Publishing a draft that indicates a requirement for something isn't the
same as obtaining WG consensus that the requirement is valid for WG work
items.

Hence my footnote about the various definitions of "necessary"...

-- Dave



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>