RE: Proposal: Capabilities Attribute

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Avi,

Come on!

> Diameter is significantly more complex protocol then RADIUS.  Hmmmmmmm is it
> an example of a protocol with way too much complexity to be successful in
> broad deployments, involving more than a very small number of implementations?

I know (personally) of 15 implementations, quite a few deployed, serving hundred
of thousands of users, so your point doesn't really hold

I think David and others are saying that complexity grafted onto a protocol after
the fact is more complex than if it had been designed into the project 
originally.

John

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>