RE: Proposal: Capabilities Attribute

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Avi,

I re-read your mail, and now realize that I completely misread your
intent, so I retract my earlier mail. I sent the mail before my morning
coffee so I was irony-impared.

John



> Avi,
> 
> Come on!
> 
> > Diameter is significantly more complex protocol then RADIUS.  Hmmmmmmm is it
> > an example of a protocol with way too much complexity to be successful in
> > broad deployments, involving more than a very small number of implementations?
> 
> I know (personally) of 15 implementations, quite a few deployed, serving hundred
> of thousands of users, so your point doesn't really hold
> 
> I think David and others are saying that complexity grafted onto a protocol after
> the fact is more complex than if it had been designed into the project 
> originally.
> 
> John
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>