RE: Issue 37: Merging of Filter Attributes

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Bernard wrote:

> BTW, it is interesting to be finding these differences years 
> *after* RFC 2865 was approved as a Draft standard.

Perhaps its not broken.  It is what it is and people make use of it as they
may - and it was probably designed that way.

After all, the very nature of Filter-Id requires that there is knowledge by
both party of the filters that each Id represents and as well if you you
multiple filter ids the semantics of what happens.
 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>