[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comments on draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt
- To: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>, Frank Quick <fquick@qualcomm.com>, Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
- Subject: RE: Comments on draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt
- From: Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:06:53 -0500
- Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, gwz@cisco.com, Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "W. Mark Townsley" <townsley@cisco.com>, "Carroll, Christopher P." <Ccarroll@ropesgray.com>, gerry.flynn@verizonwireless.com, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
David,
>
> I'm not looking to unreasonably bash this work, given that
> the errors were very likely based on a lack of detailed
> understanding of RADIUS and a lack of timely review by
> subject matter experts. Still, I think in the interests of
> "truth in advertising", we need to consider the disputed
> RADIUS usages as being deprecated.
Actually this is not true. It was a calculated decision to use
Access-Reject. Perhaps Frank or someone closer to it would tell you why they
did that.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>