[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Comments on draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt

To: "Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org>
Subject: RE: Comments on draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt
From: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:07:34 -0500
Cc: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>


>   Given the discussion surrounding Access-Reject, and the comments
> about RFC 2869, I think we should open another issue for the RFC 2869
> violation of Access-Reject semantics, independent of this draft.

Yes.  The RADEXT chairs have also reached that conclusion.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt
Next by Date: ISSUE: Improper use of Access-Reject in RFC 2869
Previous by thread: Re: Comments on draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt
Next by thread: RE: Comments on draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread