RE: Pre-work item review

["Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>]

Nelson, David <> supposedly scribbled:

> As a reminder to the RADEXT WG members, please respond either
> affirmatively or negatively with respect to each of these
documents.
> Should the draft(s) become a RADEXT WG Work Item?  {Yes | No} 
> 
> You may comment on the four IPv6 MIB update documents as one,
because
> they have highly similar content. 

What does the current content of the drafts have to do with the
question?  

> 
> Silence is not generally accepted as WG consensus, so your active
> reply is requested. 

Interesting, since this flies in the face of several thousand years
of traditional interpretation of silence as assent.  

> 
>> As discussed at today's meeting, we are looking to gauge WG
interest
>> in making the following documents WG work items:
>> 
>> RADIUS MIB Revision
>>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2618bis-00.txt
>>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2619bis-00.txt
>>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2620bis-00.txt
>>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2621bis-00.txt

Yes.

>> 
>> RFC 3576 MIBs
>> 
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-c
lien
> t-
>> mib-03.txt

Yes.

>> 
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-s
erve
> r-
>> mib-03.txt

Yes.

>> 
>> RADIUS Extensions for IEEE 802
>> 
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-congdon-radext-ieee802-03.
txt

Yes.

>> 
>> Please send your comments to the RADEXT mailing list.

Hope this helps,

~gwz

Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by
simply
  listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>