[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: When to Access-Reject vs. Silently Discard

To: Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>
Subject: Re: When to Access-Reject vs. Silently Discard
From: "Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:03:57 -0400
Cc: Bikramjit Singh <BSingh@Nomadix.com>, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:16:05 EDT." <F17FB067A86B2D488382C923C532EAA704F74330@exch01.bridgewatersys.com>

Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com> wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by close in the network.  So a typical case where
> this happens is when there is a NAS in the DMZ zone and a RADIUS is
> internal.

  I understand.

  In that case, the NAT box which the RADIUS server sees as the NAS is
"closer" to the RADIUS box than the real NAS.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- RE: When to Access-Reject vs. Silently Discard
  - From: Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>

Prev by Date: RE: When to Access-Reject vs. Silently Discard
Next by Date: Any last comments on draft-adrangi-eap-network-discovery-12.txt?
Previous by thread: RE: When to Access-Reject vs. Silently Discard
Next by thread: Any last comments on draft-adrangi-eap-network-discovery-12.txt?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread