RE: Revised RADIUS MIBs I-Ds

["Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>]

Sorry for the incomplete message.  My mail client "got away from me".
:-)

I would like to call the attention of the RADEXT WG to four revised
I-Ds:
 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2618bis-01.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2619bis-01.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2620bis-01.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nelson-rfc2621bis-01.txt

The -01 versions incorporate the feedback from MIB Doctor review.  These
documents update their respective predecessor RFCs, deprecate the table
in which the IPv4-only address objects appear and add a new table
containing version neutral IP address objects.  The deprecated tables
MAY be used for backwards compatibility.

Please review and comment upon these drafts.  There will be a very short
discussion of them at IETF-63.  Shortly after IETF-63, if there are no
major issues, I propose to submit these I-Ds as RADEXT WG documents and
initiate a WG Last Call.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>