[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for Review of RFC 3576 MIB documents

Nelson, David wrote: 
I agree that the original RFC should be rectified as well.  However, I
am not sure whether we should carry the confusion into all the related
documents and then add erratas to them as well.



Perhaps not, but you would need to perform the clarification in the
protocol document (RFC 5776) and the relayed MIB concurrently, IMHO.



The last time I attempted an errata for the RFC, the standards body did not respond. IMO, as Nagi mentioned, its relatively easy to understand the difference as we have clearly laid it out in the definition of the DAC and DAS as was suggested by Bernard.

Regards,
Murtaza

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>