RE: Capabilities: Moving forward - to the problem, please

["Avi Lior" <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Hi Alan, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aland@nitros9.org [mailto:aland@nitros9.org] On Behalf 
> Of Alan DeKok
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 1:19 PM
> To: Avi Lior
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Capabilities: Moving forward - to the problem, please
> 
> "Avi Lior" <avi@bridgewatersystems.com> wrote:
> > So how about the above as a concise package of requirements......
> 
>   I agree.  I'd just add (D) as efficiency.

Thanx...

>   I think my requirement list follows from yours.  I'll 
> update my list, and map it to your requirments.

Great.
 
>   My list was *not* intended to be a laundry list of requirements.
> For example, if you look at the MUST's and SHOULD's in a 
> standard, you could easily concluse that the spec is nothing 
> more than a laundry list of requirements.

Understood...
 
>   My list was meant to satisfy another, unspoken requirement: 
> we have to be able to deploy this, and to have interoperable 
> implementations.

I think we are on a convergent path...
 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>