Re: ISSUE, SIP, authentication parameters (fwd)

["wolfgang.beck01@t-online.de" <wolfgang.beck01@t-online.de>]

See inline

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu [mailto:owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu]
> > Sent: 25 October, 2005 15:19
> > To: aaa-wg@merit.edu
> > Subject: [AAA-WG]: ISSUE, SIP, authentication parameters
> >
> >
> > Description of issue: Authentication parameters
> > Submitter name: Mikko Aittola
> > Submitter email address: mikko.aittola@nokia.com
> > Date first submitted: 25 Oct 05
> > Document: sip (v. 10)
> > Comment type: T
> > Priority: S
> > Sections: 7.7, 7.8, 8.5.3, 8.5.4, 8.5.5
> > Rationale/Explanation of issue:
> >
> > SIP-Method is defined to be required AVP in MAR-command.
> > Is there really need for this to be required AVP?
> > I think Diameter server doesn't necessarily need to consider
> > what is the SIP-method the SIP-server is asking to authenticate.
> >
> > Furthermore, there is already optional Digest-Method AVP
> > in SIP-Authorization grouped AVP. This can be used for
> > the same purpose as SIP-Method AVP.
> >
The radext draft defines only Digest-Method, not SIP method.

> > SIP-Authorization grouped AVP contains required AVP
> > Digest-Username. This is duplicate information with
> > the User-Name AVP sent in the MAR-command.
> >
I am not sure wether the User-Name syntax (think of NAI) won't
interfere with the syntax of Digest-Username (white space?).
Let's keep them separate.

> > PS. Sorry for the late submission..
> >
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sisyphos


Wolfgang



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>