AW: Capabilities presentation

["Tschofenig, Hannes" <hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com>]

hi david, 
 
i understand your concerns and i think that there is a nice migration path. 

ciao
hannes

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Nelson, David
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. November 2005 13:08
> An: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Betreff: RE: Capabilities presentation
> 
> Hannes Tschofenig writes...
> 
> > regarding the future work on the capability document. you 
> guys need to
> > decide what presentation style, requirement goals and problem
> statement
> > you might want. during the meeting i think we agreed that 
> the current
> > radius-geopriv work is largely independent of the future, more
> generic,
> > capability work.
> 
> I'm sensitive to your desire to make rapid progress.  If GEOPRIV is a
> special case, then maybe it should be treated as such.  If it 
> is simply
> part of a general case, then I worry about setting a precedent for
> handling capabilities in RADIUS (with implied general scope) that may
> affect later work, without explicitly looking at that bigger picture.
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>