RE: RE : Issue 74: RFC 3576 behavior

["Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>]

> I think that the COA procedure is a way to retrieve once again location 
> information received in a previous Access-Request (e.g. to check if the 
> previous location is still up-to-date).

If we are talking about the civil location of the NAS, why would it have 
changed?

Are we talking about a NAS located on a train that moves from city to city?  
In most cases, we are talking about a NAS that has a static location, so 
that sending periodic RFC 3576 CoA-Requests purely to see if it has changed 
civil location makes little sense.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>