[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Issue 102: NAS/QoS Filter Rule

To: <mauricio.sanchez@hp.com>, <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Issue 102: NAS/QoS Filter Rule
From: <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:23:48 +0200

Mauricio Sanchez wrote:
> 
> Can you describe which were the primary points you found useful in
> reading Avi's document? Moreover, how would you suggest the RFC draft
> incorporate those points you found useful?  Should we add yet another
> Appendix?  A new section?  Something else?

The most useful part of Avi's document to me was the section
titled "Directing flows to a single tunnel". Perhaps adding an
appendix containing roughly that material would be sufficient?

Best regards,
Pasi

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Prev by Date: RE: Issue 101: IEEE802 RFC (WG Last Call Review) Status Recap
Next by Date: Conclusion of WG last call on RFC 3576 MIBs
Previous by thread: Issue 102: NAS/QoS Filter Rule
Next by thread: RE: Issue 102: NAS/QoS Filter Rule
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread