We are very near publishing the next version with all of the filtering
issues resolved. I would like to publish this version and see how well
that draft proceeds. If the filtering function continues to hold up
this version, then we should consider your proposal. I'll will get a
firm date on when the next version will be published.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
[mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 1:08 AM
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: A Proposal for Moving Forward on draft-ietf-radext-ieee802
It is now more than 6 months since draft-ietf-radext-ieee802
went through WG last call, and progress on resolving the
Issues from WG last call has been
slow. This document is now a year behind schedule -- and
counting. We
need to find a way to make more rapid progress.
Looking over the Last Call issues, it would appear that the
majority of them relate to the filtering functionality, and
relatively few comments relate to the VLAN and Priority functionality.
In order to enable this document to be completed without
further delays, I would like to propose that the Filtering
functionality be removed from this document, and allowed to
progress separately.
This would allow for an -01 version of this documented to be
posted within the next two weeks, followed by a two week WG
last call, and submission to the IESG by IETF 65.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to
radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in
a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>