NAS-Filter-Rule (was: review of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802-01.txt)

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Hi all,

>The RADEXT WG charter requires that Diameter compatibility issues be 
>examined as part of each work item.   Extending the RFC 3588 
>NAS-Filter-Rule 
>syntax does bring up Diameter compatibility issues.  This was 
>pointed out in Issue 130, which was filed in August 2005.
>
>As I understand it, the DIME WG is being chartered to produce 
>RFC 3588bis, so one possibility is that they will consider a 
>NAS-Filter-Rule syntax revision as part of that effort.

I'm copying the DiME WG.  Is there interest in the Diameter community
in revising the NAS-Filter-Rule?  For RADIUS, it is currently defined
here:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802-01.txt

I suggest that if this is of interest to both RADIUS & Diameter, we 
come-up with a common format that would be usable in both protocols.

John

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>