RE: RADEXT WG Last Call on "RADIUS Delegated IPv6 Prefix Attribute"

["Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>]

John Schnizlein writes...

> That does not seem to me to be the (cynical) suggestion.  Rather the
> suggestion is that it is premature to hold up a last-call WG draft
> because it does not comply with an individual draft, not ready for
last
> call.

I think for this particular draft, we have all agreed that the proposed
format is acceptable.  Some of the comments in this thread, however, are
phrased in such a way as to apply to other documents, not yet in last
call.  My comments were intended to draw a distinction between the case
for *this* document and various others.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>