RE: Proposed Resolution to Issue 180: Misuse of Data Types

["Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>]

Sanchez, Mauricio <mailto:mauricio.sanchez@hp.com> supposedly scribbled:

...

> Can we agree, with whatever associated cringing, and accept the
> current state of the VLAN draft data types as acceptable?  They are
> at best a continuation of the ad-hoc design legacy and at worst an
> ugly wart that will stand out once clear design guidelines are
> defined.  I don't think anyone can pragmatically disagree that going
> forward with the VLAN draft's data types will cause insurmountable
> pain to implementers. It's only business as usual for RADIUS.      
> 
> My vote is to accept the draft as is on this matter.

OK

> 
> Cheers,
> MS

~gwz

Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by simply
  listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>