RE: New Technical Issues RE: WG last call in progress on VLAN/Priority Draft

["Avi Lior" <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Take a look at: IETF 60  August 2004.

Presentation:
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/04aug/slides/radextt-6/sld8.htm

But even before that we had that proposal from Jari.  I remember the
email distinctly.  And here is that now forgotten email
http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2004/msg00441.html

Anyway most of the discussion today is a repeat of the discusssions we
had before (rehash).  Most of the people changed (it seem) except for
David Nelson. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barney Wolff [mailto:barney@databus.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:07 PM
> To: Avi Lior
> Cc: Alan DeKok; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: New Technical Issues RE: WG last call in 
> progress on VLAN/Priority Draft
> 
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:47:17PM -0500, Avi Lior wrote:
> > 
> > Also I resent somewhat the push now is so much that it 
> ignores what we 
> > did a two years ago.  Based on discussion it was Jari who proposed 
> > encoding RADIUS attributes using Diameter syntax (I seem to recall 
> > that one of you guys were taking credit for that).
> 
> Just so we're clear, Alan did not "take" credit for it.  I 
> assigned credit to him because that's how I first heard the 
> idea, and indeed a search of radext archives shows email from 
> him suggesting it in Feb 2005.  But of course, if you or Jari 
> (or anyone) can point me to a prior discussion of the idea of 
> using the Diameter attribute header format, I will be glad to 
> correct the acknowledgment.
> 
> Regards,
> Barney
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>